Skip to main content

Manipulatives

 

Using manipulatives in elementary mathematics is extremely important for students to gain a conceptual understanding of a variety of mathematical topics. It can be difficult for teachers to determine if students can transfer their understanding from manipulatives to other situations but this is why teachers need to plan time to have students learn the concepts with the manipulatives and then give the students time to solve the problems and only use manipulatives to check their work before finally removing the manipulatives and assessing the student’s knowledge because they won’t usually have these manipulatives in higher grades and outside of the classroom. In order to assess this growth and understanding, teacher observation and questioning are crucial. Teachers need to walk around the classroom or pull individual students or small groups and have students demonstrate their thinking with and without manipulatives. Manipulatives are also great because they help students improve their problem-solving skills by using different representations of the same problem and being able to decontextualize the problem to solve with the manipulatives and then contextualize it back to the original problem 


Although group work has many benefits, it can be difficult to hold students accountable for learning when in groups. One way to do this is to purposefully build groups of students who are all learning at the same level. If a group has one or two students who are at a higher level, those students may do all the work for the group and the other students won’t learn anything. It is also helpful for teachers to build groups of students that get along with each other so they feel comfortable trying and making mistakes. During group work, it can also be difficult to assess each person’s depth of understanding. Teachers should be walking around the classroom observing students and jumping in to ask questions to students about what they are doing and having students explain their reasoning. 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ch 5:Pose Purposeful Questions

   Posing purposeful questions reminds me of the third CCSSM Standard which is Construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others because teachers should pose purposeful questions to gauge student understanding and students communicate their understanding back to the teacher through their arguments of why they got the solution they did. There are five types of purposeful questions teachers ask students which are all used for different purposes. The first type of purposeful question is gathering information, which teachers use when want students to recall basic facts or definitions (mostly things that are memorization). This is a question used to assess students because it usually has a right and wrong answer and can help the teacher gauge whether or not the student understands. The second type of purposeful question is probing thinking, which is used when teachers want students to explain, elaborate, or clarify their thinking and reasoning and why they came up wit...

Ch 4: Build Procedural Fluency from Conceptual Understanding

A conceptual understanding of math is essential for students to be successful in math classes throughout their life. To me, conceptual understanding is the basics of math (addition, subtraction, multiplication, division, equalities, etc), why these concepts work, how they work together, and then being able to remember and draw from these concepts in more complex problems. In order for students to gather conceptual understanding, they need to be willing and ready to learn and they also need to believe in themselves and their intelligence. The teacher's role is to be the expert but to guide students toward these understandings and not simply state them like facts, or else students will memorize them and not understand why these concepts work and why they are important in the future.  Procedural fluency is the ability to use equations, representations, manipulatives, etc to solve a simple problem. The word simple is relative to the child’s grade level and also their academic level. Fo...

NAEP Reflection

  Based on the seven pieces of student work on the gumball problem, I learned that this problem shouldn't be assessed or graded as just right or wrong. To properly assess student learning or student knowledge using this problem, teachers need to understand the student’s thinking. If they got the right answer, teachers need to determine if the student actually understood what the problem was asking and how to use probability to get that answer, or if they just guessed. That is important in this problem specifically, because the problem basically asked the student to give an answer that was an integer between 1 and 10 and the correct answers were 4-6 so if a student guessed, they still had a 30% chance of getting it right even without understanding the problem or the concept of probability. If the student got the wrong answer, it is also important to understand the student’s thinking. Some of the students got the wrong answer because they really didn't understand probability. Som...